Yes in a way this is another review of the movie
“3”, but its nothing like the other reviews I have read. I am
quiet surprised at the fan reaction and even the reviews I have
read all over the internet and in newspapers regarding this
movie. Funny how for the past six months or so all I heard from
many people was how they did not want to watch this movie and
were appalled that ESPN was going to air a movie without the
approval of DEI, or any of the Earnhardt family (although Martha
did allow them to use the house and property in the movie). I
was one of the few fans that stated I would watch it with an
open mind and reserve my opinion for afterwards. I didn’t want
to be a member of the jury that made a verdict before the trial
even began.I guess you can say I would be the person holding
out and causing a hung jury. I am not in the majority at all. I
did not think this movie did Dale justice. I viewed the movie in
the privacy of my home; the kids were asleep so I would have no
distractions. My husband, who has not been a fan of NASCAR for
more than 5 years, watched it with me. He was not a fan of Dale
Earnhardt, matter of fact he was a Dale Jarrett fan when I met
him, and since has added Dale Junior as another favorite. So in
a way we had the ideal audience for this movie – a longtime
die-hard fan of Dale, and a fan of his son, but a new fan
nonetheless, with limited knowledge of Dale himself.
I have recently read the comments by Kerry Earnhardt and by
Darryl Waltrip aka (DW). Kerry stated in an interview he
conducted with KFNS of St. Louis, that he was very disappointed
in how the movie portrayed his father and most of the movie was
factually inaccurate. He went on to say that Dale wasn’t the way
he was depicted in the movie. Kerry stated in the interview, he
was never called for his input and felt that if he was or any
member of his family was contacted it would have been very
accurate. In his column on Fox Sports, DW said that he wasn’t
happy with the way he was portrayed in the movie and how they
painted an inaccurate picture of his friendship with Dale.
Though they had their hard times on the track and were fierce
competitors, they left it at the track; they were friendly off
the track and always talked every Christmas Eve. Might I point
out that both of these men did not give any input to the movie.
DW stated in his column, that he was contacted by the producers
to assist, but felt that since the Earnhardt family didn’t
approve, it wasn’t proper for him to work on it.
I watched the movie and felt that the first 45 minutes of the
movie might have been the most interesting to those diehard
fans, as Dale was a very private person and his personal life
was just that – personal. (I wish we could teach politicians and
athletes to adhere to this rule.) So unless Dale gave an
interview where he’d divulge information, you could only hear
about his life outside of racing from another driver’s anecdotes
or from “unauthorized biographies”. Unfortunately Dale rarely
gave an in-depth interview and we didn’t know how factual or
reliable other information was from other mediums. Therefore I
was very interested in this part of the movie that was “before
the Intimidator”.
The movie appeared chopped up and very rushed. Although it
“aired” for 2 hours, it was only 90 minutes in length. How can
you cover 50 years of a man’s life in 90 minutes – especially
the many moments in Dale’s life and career that was of interest
to his fans and the new fans of NASCAR itself? The second part
of the movie (the “Intimidator” part) was even more rushed and
further chopped up. Many times they forgot to tell us what year
they were talking about and thus presented stories that appeared
to many of the fans “very inaccurate”. They skipped years and
even appeared to skip decades but failed to mention that to the
viewers. While the fans knew which race they were talking about
or showed, the part of the story that connected the races –
Dale’s personal life – didn’t connect to the race without
telling us which year this was supposed to be. This played an
important part when Dale interacted with Dale Jr., it made these
scenes implausible due to known facts of Dale’s life and what
happened or was said at particular races. Even my husband was
able to pick up on several fallacies in the second half of the
movie. A particular scene comes to mind when Dale went to see
his son after suffering a nightmare which was shown right after
they showed the Daytona 500 in 1998. The music picked for Junior
to be listening to was a very popular tune, but a tune that was
not released until 2000. However it was made to appear that the
timeline was still shortly after Dale’s victory at the Daytona
500. In this same scene, Dale told Junior to make sure to wear
the head restraint system. Junior said yes sir. I know this was
a “movie” and they would use creative writing, but this did not
have to be said as a mode of foreshadowing. Every person knows
what happened to Dale in 2001 and we know that the head and neck
restraint devices were made mandatory after his death because it
could have helped save his life and maybe others in the past and
future. However, we also know that Dale would have been one of
the last ones to wear such a device, and I personally do not
believe (without hearing it from Dale Junior himself or a member
of his family) that Dale would have asked his son to wear
something he himself would not put on, for safety or not. It was
not widely used and most drivers were reluctant to even test the
HANS device at that time.
Many reviewers of the film – fans and “experts” alike –
stated they thought Pepper’s performance as Dale was almost
flawless and so like Dale. I disagree! In the day and age of
movie magic – the likeness should have been “dead-on” and the
makeup and prosthetics were so “off” it was almost comical.
Pepper’s voice didn’t even portray a fake bad Southern accent.
The only things that reminded me of Dale were his moustache and
the words he said, but then again they were Dale’s words (or
some of them anyways – the one-liners or quotes said so often we
know he said them). Although one of the most famous one-liners
Dale said was stated at Bristol after spinning out Terry
Labonte, however in the movie, it was associated with Dale
having an encounter with Waltrip. This was bad placement as that
was a very well known quote – don’t change history to make a
better movie, it makes it worse.
Also I noted that Pepper in the Goodwrench uniform was
comical. I am sorry to say, but I have seen countless hours of
Dale in that uniform and believe me his butt filled out the
uniform nicely, whereas Pepper’s was almost non-existent. A
minor fact I know, but believe me, female fans KNOW this. In
addition, the uniforms that were on his crew weren’t even
remotely close to the team uniforms. The race footage
intertwined in the movie was perfect because it was real.
However when they went back to the movie parts, the car was all
wrong, cameras were in spots they wouldn’t have been in. I could
go on, but to put it mildly, I was appalled with the racing
sequences that weren’t real footage.
I won’t even comment on the horrendous casting of Ron Prather
playing Childress or Greg Thompson as Darryl Waltrip. It’s
amazing that Childress and many others were hardly mentioned in
the movie, and we all know how close Dale was with Richard,
Rusty, DJ and others. At least the actor playing Humpy Wheeler
looked very similar to him in the early days. I do have to say
the Chad McCumbee who portrayed Dale Junior in his later years
(as a NASCAR driver) was almost dead-on perfect. Except for the
goatee which wasn’t quite the proper color and a few facial
differences, I almost felt like I was watching Dale Jr. for
real. I have followed Junior since the very beginning and was
amazed at how well McCumbee did in portraying him. I even had my
back to the TV during one of the many replays of the movie, and
when I heard him speak as Dale Jr. I had to turn because I could
have sworn my husband had changed the channel to a Dale Jr.
interview! Not once did I do that when Pepper was speaking.
I have to scale down the rest of my review of this movie due
to constraints I am sure I am pushing with space. There are just
way too many bad points about this movie which makes it
impossible for me to recommend this movie. Based on given the
fact that the part that even intrigued me (before Intimidator),
I now read that members of the Earnhardt family claim it was
factually inaccurate. I know this is a movie, but it’s a
biography of a man whose life was in the public eye for over 25
years, so it should be much more accurate than it was;
especially seeing that ESPN has done a better job with their
Sports Century program and other programs (even the one on ESPN
Classic after the premier of the movie) that was done with
better class and accuracy than this movie. The producers (which
Pepper was one), could have even read the book Determined, by
Benny Phillips which was an authorized book by Dale himself,
with his own input. I also do not want a new fan to get wrong
information about a man who was so great. He was not as he was
depicted in the movie. He never showed fear, which led all of us
fans to believe the track was the last place he would lose his
life at and would ultimately retire from racing. Dale was a man
who gave to many people without any desire for the world to know
about it. He was a practical joker; he was a man that lived for
his family. He was a driver, he was a racer, he was a friend,
and he was an idol and hero to many, including myself.