|
Last Saturday’s race at
Richmond International
Raceway in the southern
state of Virginia was
the setting for
penalties handed down
faster than you can say
“rapid release gel” by
NASCAR. A look at the
big picture reveals two
incidents in particular
might prove to be worth
noting. During the
course of the Saturday
night showdown at RIR,
both Michael Waltrip and
Denny Hamlin were
penalized in-race for
what could be considered
major infractions. The
speed and timing of
these punishments was
different from previous
methods utilized by the
governing force within
NASCAR. From where the
fans stood, it was a
rapid release with no
time to gel.
Michael Waltrip
Late in the Dan Lowry
400 (sponsored by Crown
Royal), Casey Mears
nailed Waltrip’s no. 55
Dodge from behind,
sending it into the wall
coming off turn four of
the “D” shaped track.
Mears later stated that
lack of radio
communication between
him and his team might
have been a factor.
Waltrip retaliated a few
laps later by
intentionally slamming
into the back of Mears’
car and pushing him
viciously on the track
several hundred yards.
NASCAR’s response was to
park Michael Waltrip for
the remainder of the
race, estimated to be
about 58 laps. Waltrip
declared on Speed
Channel’s This Week
in NASCAR program
that he “felt like he
was 12 years old
again.” The incident
and penalty cost Waltrip
dearly in the point
standings as he dropped
to 32nd in
the ranking. Waltrip’s
season goal appears to
be a concerted effort to
remain top 35 within the
point system and avoid a
repeat of last season’s
agony of having to “go
or go home” qualify
prior to each Cup
event. Mears finished
36th, one
position ahead of
Waltrip. Both drivers
are dancing precariously
on the edge of falling
out of the top 35
owner’s points rule.
Denny Hamlin
Hamlin dominated RIR
with a record setting
381 laps led in the
race, before falling
victim to a tire
deflating. He continued
in the race on this tire
until inside 10 laps to
go when he stopped his
car on the high side of
the track forcing a
caution. Upon waving of
the caution flag, Hamlin
then proceeded to pit
road. NASCAR held
Hamlin for two laps
immediately as a
penalty. The
sanctioning body felt
that Hamlin had
deliberately committed
this act in effort to
aid teammate Kyle Busch
to take the lead and
possibly win. Hamlin
has denied this, and
felt that the immediate
ruling was unfair. This
incident resulted in a
24th place
finish for Hamlin
overall.
So what does this
possibly mean for the
sport of racing?
NASCAR has threatened
several times within
previous seasons an
increase in the degree
of harshness in
penalties handed down.
The past method of
issuing penalties came
in the form of fines,
point deductions, and
even suspensions for
crew chiefs for pre or
post-race inspection
violations. After
admonishing teams and
drivers that penalties
would increase and
current rules would be
enforced, the purported
harshness seemed to come
in the form of higher
fines, higher point
deductions, and longer
suspension time from
race activities. That
is until now.
Suddenly, in the 10th
race of the season,
NASCAR is making quicker
decisions and instantly
punishing those
perceived as changing
the outcome of the
race. Whether an
incident or issue is
committed accidentally
or purposely seems to
matter not. The bottom
line? Commit an act
“detrimental to stock
car racing” on the track
and you will see your
own fate changed
immediately, and quite
starkly.
It should be noted that
neither Waltrip nor
Hamlin sustained any
further penalties
post-race. There was no
need for further
reprimand, both drivers
felt the sting and took
significant hits in
post-race results. Fans
may also have noticed
that so far this season,
driver skirmishes
outside the cars are not
being policed as
heavily. This has long
been a necessary tactic,
since drivers are human
and not robotic, and
therefore likely to have
an opinion on the
driving style of
another. Frankly, who
cares if a driver
approaches another to
“discuss” an issue that
happened during the
competition?
Is this new and swift
handling of perceived
rule violations wise?
Could this, perhaps,
give NASCAR more power
over race results, or
did they always have
that particular power to
begin with? It goes
without saying that
while NASCAR could not
control who won the
race, they definitely
had a say in who would
not. This seemingly new
method of discipline
proves to be a warning
to all who participate
in the sport. Once this
penalty infraction is
handed down, there is no
appeal. There is also
no arguing, and there is
no recourse for
redemption. The price
of admission in this
sport just went up, and
payment is due before
the race is complete.
You can contact
Shannon at
shanjrfan8@aol.com
The opinions expressed
on this site are not necessarily those of the publisher. All
comments other than website related problems need to be directed to
the author. Copyright 2000-2008 SpeedwayMedia.com.
More by
this author:
|