|
The
debate rages on about
road racing for NASCAR’s
Sprint Cup series. Road
racing is a long-time
NASCAR tradition. Many
years ago, the season
started at Riverside,
California with a road
race in January. Even
back in those days, the
so-called “ringers” were
hired to drive cars
usually occupied by
regular NASCAR drivers.
A. J. Foyt and Dan
Gurney drove for the
Wood Brothers. And, of
course there were
others, but even back in
those days, it was
obvious that the huge
cars were just not the
best things to put on a
road course.
Riverside is gone
(and a friend who live
there says is the home
of either a shopping
center or a line of
condos) and still we try
to run nearly 4,000
pound stocks cars on
these courses. The
results are sometimes
spectacular. Witness the
big pileup at the end of
Sunday’s race at Watkins
Glen. Fans love this
sort of thing, but the
truth remains that
putting these drivers on
road courses is a
miscarriage of justice.
On Saturday, Marcos
Ambrose, who sits 10th
in NASCAR Nationwide
series points, won the
race. Why? Because
Ambrose is an
accomplished road racer.
It kind of explains why
Foyt and Gurney had so
much success at
Riverside in the 1960’s
and 1970’s. Often, this
is not the case and one
has to look no farther
than Sunday’s race at
the Glen. Kyle Busch won
on that day—a guy who’s
won everything this year
anyway, but the truth
remains. Ambrose was in
the Wood Brothers Ford
Sunday and given enough
laps, he would have
probably won that race
too. It’s just not fair
to put the regulars of
this series, based on
ovals, to have them
wheel two ton cars
around a road course.
For the record, I was
rooting for Ambrose to
win because he was
driving for the
legendary team. For a
team who had shown
nothing all year, it
seems strange that in
this race they had one
of the fastest cars.
Coincidence? Hardly.
Many will disagree;
including those fanatics
who flock to the Glen
and Sonoma each year to
witness the Sprint Cup
stars flog the big cars
around the road course.
I have said from the
beginning that if we
continue this pattern,
we should use smaller,
lighter cars on the road
courses, but no one
listens. Regardless,
with tracks like
Kentucky Speedway and
even Darlington Raceway
begging for a date on
the schedule, maybe it’s
time to consider
dropping these races. It
won’t happen, but it’s
an exercise in futility
for most of the
accomplished oval track
drivers. NASCAR needs to
figure out what their
niche is. It sure isn’t
road racing.
One more thing.
Wasn’t it weak that
NASCAR’s answer to Mo
Grant’s lawsuit was
accusations about her
personal life? I mean,
all they could come up
with was the fact that
Ms. Grant has “stalked”
a boyfriend and had been
convicted of DUI. If her
comments are true about
what went down during
her employment with
NASCAR, the comparison
does not hold water.
It’s comparing apples to
oranges. One sin does
not absolve another. For
the good of all, this
lawsuit needs to be
negotiated and settled.
Most of the accused have
either been fired or
suspended, and NASCAR
needs to get this behind
them. Unfortunately, it
appears NASCAR will
continue to justify what
went on by discrediting
Grant’s personal life.
It’s typical in today’s
society. Regardless of
the sin, just run the
accuser through the
trash by pointing out
their sins. It’s the
American way, I guess,
but it may make this go
on longer than it needs
to. For the good of the
sport, settle. Please.
You can
contact Ron at
ron.fleshman@verizon.net
The opinions expressed
on this site are not necessarily those of the publisher. All
comments other than website related problems need to be directed to
the author. Copyright 2000-2008 SpeedwayMedia.com.
More by
this author:
|